NRCC Meeting in Public Wednesday 22nd January 2025

NAIRN RIVER COMMUNITY COUNCIL 

Comhairle Coimhearsnachd Abhainn Narann

A Meeting in Public of the

Nairn River Community Council

Held in the

Nairn Community & Arts Centre

on

Wednesday, 22nd January 2025 7:00PM

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­________________

A G E N D A        

  1. Members Present, Apologies and Declarations of Interest
  2. Minutes of previous meeting – matters arising
  3. Treasurers Report
  4. Planning Report
  5. Tree in Sutors Avenue
  6. Staffing Issues – Nairn Academy – Request for Public Meeting
  7. Bin Collections – Food Waste
  8. Car Parking Survey
  9. Highland Local Development Plan – Evidence Gathering Exercise
  10. AOB – Flood Resilience / Blackpark batteries / Visitor Levies / Community Benefits Net Zero / Common Good / Local Place Plan / Highland Investment Plan / CC Review
  11. Next Meeting date.
  12. Chair closes meeting.

Due to impending updates this Agenda is liable to change at the Chairs discretion in accordance to the SofE rules.

Proposed Meeting Dates
2025
22/01/202523/04/2025
19/02/202521/05/2025
19/03/2025AGM 18/06/2025

Nairn Flood Risk Report

Fluvial & Tidal Flood Risk Assessment

Prepared for: The Highland Council in July 2023

NRCC has been asking THC these last few years for a survey to be carried on the River and the coastline along Nairn Beach. We were advised that there were no funds available to do so but here one is completed in 2023. It has taken sixteen months for THC to publish the document. Please see the links below to the final document and to the 2 appendix. Scarey reading for those who could be the worst affected. There are many details taken from Historical documents from the 19th century that, on their own are worth a read.

Nairn Flood Risk Appraisal Final Report

http://Flood_risk_appraisal_final_report_appendix_A

http://Flood Risk Appraisal_final_report_appendix_b_h

Fishertown

Househill

Nairn Active Travel MasterPlan 2010 & IMFLDP2 2024

Interesting document that is rearranging Nairn streets and costs more than Nairn has received in many years. It is a conglomeration of plans from 2010 and 2021 that THC may have seen fit to rejuvenate in light of the recent Community Led Local Place Plan being such a success. Take a look at what was coming our way. There are some links in the document for you to explore – First link below. Then we come to IMFLDP2 published in September 2024 – NRCC are not saying we disagree with the plan in any way – NRCC were elected in November 2022 and have never been consulted on these plans as they now exist. Basically it seem that THC has taken the 2010/2021 plan and dumped it wholesale into the IMFLDP2.

Nairn Active Travel MasterPlan

IMFLDP2 Delivery Programme September 2024

Quote from NATMP: Nairn is a key service area within the IMF and has significant housing allocation of around 2,500 new homes between 2011 and 2031.

NATMP – A Bus gate to prevent vehicles from accessing the High Street,with the exception of blue badge holders, emergency vehicles and servicing. IMFLDP2 – Action 6 – Bus Gate on High Street between Gordon Street and Leopold Street (0.37km). Bus gate to prevent vehicles accessing the High Street, with the exception of blue badge holders, emergency vehicles and servicing

NATMP – One-way vehicle movements on Mill Road to allow for segregated active travel infrastructure where possible, including safe crossing points at desire lines. Link to the
train station from Mill Road via George Street. Potential to extend if alternative development sites come forward. It is proposed that a high quality active travel route with one-way vehicle movements and safe crossing points is provided, which begins along Church Street and continues along Mill Road. This route should be high quality, segregated active travel infrastructure where feasible. There is an additional section along George Street proposed for this action, which would provide active travel access to Nairn Rail Station. IMFLDP2 – Action 7 – One way high quality active travel route on Mill Road. Mill Road, between the High Street and B9090, and George Street to provide link to the train station (1km). One-way vehicle movements on Mill Road to allow for segregated active travel infrastructure where possible, including safe crossing points at desire lines. Link to the train station from Mill Road via George Street.

Mill Road to be one-way but no ‘ordinary’ vehicles on High Street. Interesting for those of us who live on or near Church Street. Vehicles could travel into Church Street (or is it out) but could not travel back out (or is it in).

Lochloy Active Travel Bridge – that old chestnut that the residents of Lochloy rejected – is on the plan… again. NATMP – Enhancement of active travel connections between Lochloy and the rest of Nairn, including potential active travel Bridge over railway line, between Lochloy and Balmakeith Business Park. IMFLDP2 Enhancement of active travel connections between Lochloy and the rest of Nairn, including potential active travel Bridge over railway line, between Lochloy and Balmakeith Business Park

20 mph Review – Wards 18 Nairn & Cawdor

NRCC have received an update from the Highland Council Road Safety Team on the on-going 20mph pilot programme. The team have advised that all of the roads currently restricted to 20mph under the scheme will remain at 20mph except for one, a stretch of the B9090 Nairn to Cawdor Road, once the final TRO is in place. The Ward Members have requested that Sandown Farm lane remains at 20mph but have accepted the recommendation of the Road Safety Team on the B9090 stetch. This means there will be only two roads in Nairn under the control of THC that will be restricted to 30mph, the other being the A939 from the junction with the A96 to the edge of Town.

Section of Cawdor Road being returned to 30mph restriction, marked in purple

Please see below update from the Road safety Team

The review of the ongoing 20mph pilot programme that is running in Highland – full details for the programme, settlements, background information, TTRO and the road to permanence can be found on THC webpages at www.highland.gov.uk/20mph.

20mph Criteria

The assessment criteria provided to Highland Council by Transport Scotland used for assessing settlements for inclusion in the programme can be found here https://www.highland.gov.uk/info/1523/transport_and_streets/1049/20mph_programme/4

TRO Process/Timescales

The Highland Council reduced speed limit roll out has been delivered using a Temporary Road Traffic Regulation Order (TTRO) which is valid for a period of 18 months and runs till 31st January 2025. The Council are required to go through the full statutory process for the making of the permanent Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) and it is scheduled that this process will begin in September this year.

Post Implementation Assessment Criteria

A simplified version of Transport Scotland’s ‘Measurement of Success’ post implementation assessment criteria given to Highland Council against which all 125 settlements in the Council Area have been assessed is as follows:

Recorded Mean Average SpeedsAction Required
Mean average speeds ≤ 25mph                         No further action required, proceed to final TRO.
Mean average speed 25.1mph – 28mphFurther speed management measures to be considered and either proceed to TRO or review for removal.              
Mean average speed ≥ 28mph                                       Is the road appropriate for a 20 mph speed limit?               Is there community support for a 20 mph speed limit?Consideration for implementation of Engineering solutions if there is the community will to retain the 20mph speed limit.Revert limit back to 30 mph?

Highland Wide Picture

Following on from the informal wider public consultation that the Council undertook in Dec ‘23/Jan ’24 the following has been undertaken.

The Road Safety Team have now carried out assessments, and provided recommendations, for all 125 settlements included in the current TTRO. 

These assessments were undertaken using both the Transport Scotland Criteria along with the feedback from the Informal Public Consultation undertaken at the end of 2023/beginning of 2024 along with public correspondence the Road Safety Team has received out with this.

The Road Safety Team have met with each Area Roads Operations Manager to discuss these assessments and come to a final agreement from a road’s perspective.Elected Members have been informed of the assessment outcomes and have had chance to comment on them.

Out of the 125 settlements that have changed, the recommendations to date are as follows:

82 settlements proceed straight to the final TRO with no additional infrastructure requirements.

24 settlements requiring soft measures (e.g. installation of 20mph roundels, speed indication device signage) and then proceeding to inclusion in final TRO.

19 settlements with locations within them that are not achieving the desired speed result and require review.

Nairn & Cawdor Map

All plans for 20mph schemes in Nairn & Cawdor can be found here https://www.highland.gov.uk/directory/72/locations_for_20mph_programme/category/571

I am pleased to provide you with the details re the assessments that have been carried out on the temporary 20 mph speed limits that have been in place in Nairn & Cawdor since last summer and the recommendations we are looking to take forward into the final Traffic Regulation Order (TRO).

We can confirm that all settlements in Nairn & Cawdor have now been assessed against the criteria provided by Transport Scotland and agreements reached with the local Area Roads Team.

Sandown Farm LaneOur initial thoughts here were to revert the section marked in purple on the PowerPoint to 30mph.  On discussion with members they have requested that this remains at 20mph so we are happy to go with this as the recommendation.  
B9090 Nairn to Cawdor RoadThe recommendation is therefore to relocate the gateway on this section of road closer to Nairn itself (i.e. revert the section marked in purple to 30mph) as the current section doesn’t fit criteria and relocation closer to Nairn itself will greatly benefit compliance within the town as a whole.  

Bench

Nairn River Community Council took on the job of repairing a bench at the Riverside. The wood was donated by a local sawmill and the paint by the Highland Council. All the labour and skills were provided by NRCC Members as was the transportation unit. This happened some time ago and is being enjoyed by the river walkers.

NRCC submission to the Scot Gov Consultation on MCAs

Masterplan Consent Areas

Extract from NRCC/NW&SCC Joint meeting minutes.

Late in April 2024 The Highland Council (THC) wrote a paper to be submitted to the Scottish Government consultation on ‘Masterplan Consent Areas’. While other Councils chose to present their submission paper to their Planning Committee THC decided to present theirs to the Economy and Infrastructure Committee, a committee not known to deal with planning matters. The paper was to answer twenty questions set by the MCA consultation.

In essence THC proposed that the MCA be set to over-rule Communities; Community Councils; Scottish Examining Reporters, NPF4, the Community Empowerment Act and the Councils own Planning department. THC would then be in a position to build whatever they wanted, wherever they wanted, whenever they wanted. This would include areas currently excluded from development by the Examining Reporters and removed from the just adopted LDP. Four such sites were included in their submission, Tain, Invergordon, Evanton and Nairn.

Once alerted to this position NRCC, NW&SCC and NICE organised a group, at very short notice, to discuss the situation with the Nairn Ward Councillors. NRCC contacted many Community Councils, THC Members, MSPs and MPs. NRCC received a lot of supporting feedback from different CCs and others. A briefing and position paper was written and provided to the vice chair of the E&I Committee. It is believed that as a result of the extra pressure from CCs and other sources a meeting was held between Councillors and Officers, prior to the E&I Committee meeting, where THCs submission was very slightly amended. All four of Nairn Ward Councillors spoke at the E&I Committee clearly stating that Nairn did not support the position being taken by THC. Please below the questions set by the consultation and the responses and statements submitted by NRCC.

1 :A) To what extent do you agree with the principle that regulations be kept to the minimum necessary and that more advice be offered in guidance and kept updated?

Disagree

Regulations for all aspects must be maintained at a level where Community input is maintained and respected. Unscrupulous planners could use lack of regulations to push developments, unwanted by the Community, proven through the Local Place Plan process, into being. Definition of requirements within regulations offer certainty for the Community and clear understanding on what can be challenged.

2 :A) We are not proposing to regulate to exclude any form of development from having potential to be within a MCA. To what extent do you agree with this approach?

Disagree

Any site proposed for development that has been identified by a Local Place Plan to be unsuitable, unnecessary, inappropriate or unwanted by the Community, or on the findings of a Scottish Reporter, either temporary or permanently restricted, should be exempted from MCAs until that position is lifted by the Community or the Scottish Reporter. ‘Local Place Plans’ and the ‘Community Empowerment Act’ must be seen as equal to or supersede any regulations or guidance on MCAs.

3 :A) We are not proposing any changes to the designations listed in schedule 5A (paragraph 3(4)). To what extent do you agree with this approach?

Neutral

The list of designations should be limited to important national and international features. MCAs should also be used to support town centre regeneration particularly where Conservation areas may be impacted. It is important that planners use MCAs to improve Towns and Town centres rather than Green field sites just because it is easier and cheaper for developers.

4 :A) To what extent do you agree that the matters above in relation to the statement be set out in guidance rather than regulations?

Disagree Regulation on the timing of these proposed MCAs must be in place, The Highland Council has a tendency to publish planning documentation during Christmas Holiday periods or Summer Holiday periods when Communities are less likely to become involved in the processes. Community Councils are often sent documents after their ‘monthly’ meeting that have to be responded to before their next meeting. Community Councils have to make all their decisions in Public therefore either an extra meeting has to be called or no response is provided. Communty Councils are poorly funded and run by unpaid volunteers so cannot always afford either the time nor the money to hold extra single-item meetings

5 :A. Draft Regulation 3(4) specifies that planning authorities must consult with community councils before determining the content of any MCA proposals which may be publicised. To what extent do you agree with this?

Strongly Agree   Community Councils should be involved as soon as the any decision is made to initiate an MCA process in the area covered by the Community Council. This should be as early as possible in the process so as to enable the Community Council to consult with their Community before any meetings are arranged. Timing of Consultation meetings should be regulated to be set as appropriate for Community Councillors to avoid excluding those who work during the day to attend meetings

6 :A) Draft Regulation 3 provides how consultation for possible proposals for a MCA scheme is to be undertaken, including notification and the requirement to undertake two public events, with opportunity to make comments to the planning authority. To what extent do you agree with this approach?

Agree

It is important that the regulations cover the times that these public events can be held. Holding these events during day-time working hours excludes many people. Timing must be set to include those only available during the day and also those only available during the evenings

7: A) To what extent do you agree that the regulations should require reasons for conditions to be set out in the MCA scheme?

Strongly Agree

In the interests of transparency this would seem fair.

8:A) Are there any further aspects you consider should be required to be included in an MCA scheme? Please specify and explain why.

The MCAs need to be assessed on a case by case basis. The Local Planning Authority needs to consider each aspect within its local context and MUST HAVE REGARD TO the comments/objections of the Community, Community Councils or have regard to the aspirations set out in Local Place Plans. Once an MCA Scheme is approved, adherence and interpretation of it rests with the Planning Authority – In our case Highland Council, therefore,

(a) what assurances will communities/public have that this adherence and interpretation will be strictly enforced?

(b) where there is deviation or a difference in interpretation, what mechanism will be put in place to invite comments from the relevant Community Councils/residents so they may have the opportunity to request the Planning Authority to adhere more rigidly to the agreed MCA scheme BEFORE any consents are given by the Planning Authority?

Consistency in interpretation of MCA Schemes is a must otherwise this exposes Highland Council to legal challenge

(c) will Planning Authorities be required to undertake more visible site and build enforcement to avoid Housing Developers from changing site plans, e.g. drainage layout, roads, landscaping, type/size/number of units etc?  We don’t want another sewage disaster as happened at Lochloy Meadowlea Phase 3.

(d) where a community through its Local Place Plan considers the MCA scheme to be being  abused, overdevelopment, or without parallel infrastructure improvements, what mechanism will be put in place to suspend the MCA scheme until a full review is undertaken with the Community in question?

(e) another aspect which is not covered specifically in the guidance is the right of Communities through their Local Place Plan to request an MCA scheme e.g. for “Nairn” Town Centre or protection of a conservation area, e.g. Fishertown in Nairn.

If the intent of MCA guidance and regulations is openness and transparency and not to replace proper development/planning management and process, it seems only prudent to express concern that the local Planning Authority Highland Council seem to currently be applying a singular use to MCA schemes i.e. ONLY for housing on greenfield sites already examined/removed by the SG Reporter from the LDP.  This is viewed by Communities and the public as a back door mechanism to get round the wishes of Communities as contained in their LPPs, and the findings of the Examination Reporters and is directly in conflict with openness and transparency.

9: A) Draft Regulation 4(3) and Schedule 1 of the draft MCA Regulations specify those who a planning authority must consult with before determining the content of any MCA proposals which may be publicised. To what extent do you agree with these groups?

Neutral

Consultation must include those groups and individuals listed but should go further to include the Local Place Plan Group, adjoining Community Councils. Public consultation events must take place regardless of the size of the proposed MCA. Planning authorities must undertake effective community engagement in relation to the local MCA plan

10: A) Draft Regulation 4(2) provides how consultation in relation to an MCA scheme is to be undertaken. To what extent do you agree with this approach?

Disagree

Planning Authority must include consultation with Community Councils as a matter of course and must take regard of their comments. Planning authorities must undertake effective community engagement in relation to any local MCA plan, respect the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015) and to respect any Local Place Plan in place.

11: A) Draft Regulation 4(5) sets a 30 day period for representations if they are to be treated as valid representations. To what extent do you agree with this period?

Disagree Community Councils are often sent documents after their ‘monthly’ meeting that have to be responded to before their next ,monthly’ meeting. In the interests of transparency and overworked volunteer Community Councils it would better serve the Communities if the period for representation was 45 days to at least give the CCs a chance to provide well informed representations

12: A) To what extent do you agree with the required circumstances, i.e. that where the scheme would authorise a national development, that there be a requirement for a hearing, as set out within Draft Regulation 5(1)?

Agree

This appears to be in line with NPF4 in relation to National Developments.

13: A) To what extent do you agree with the proposals for those who must be given an opportunity to appear before and be heard by a committee of the planning authority at a hearing as set out within Draft Regulations 5(2) and (3)?

Agree in principle and these hearing opportunities must be open to Community Councils and Community Representatives.

14: A) To what extent do you agree that a Notification Direction be issued requiring that in the above circumstances such MCA schemes be notified to the Scottish Ministers?

Agree

The proposals seem consistent with the current Regulations but we would like this widened to include notification to the Scottish Reporters in the event that any proposed MCAs that are being planned for areas that the Scottish Reporters have deemed unsuitable, unnecessary or unwanted by the Community either temporary or permanently restricted.

15: A) To what extent do you agree with the proposed requirements in relation to the publication of MCA schemes and the decision notice as set out in Draft Regulation 7?

Disagree

The provision does not go far enough, there is no mention of Community Councils in the arrangements nor of areas that do not have a “Local Newspaper” therefore many people will be left uninformed by restricting the notice to “just publishing in a local newspaper circulating in the area and on the internet”.

16: A) To what extent do you agree with the proposed requirements in relation to the planning register as set out in Draft Regulation 9?

Disagree The register must be Publicly Available and without a requirement for an FOI. It must be freely available and transparent

17: A) To what extent do you agree with the proposals for the procedures for altering a MCA scheme, as set out in Draft Regulation 8?

Disagree

Where a development for which authorisation is granted by a scheme has begun and is subsequently altered then the authorisation for the scheme should be reconsidered. A notice of alteration must be circulated around all the relevant groups or individuals who have shown an interest in the Scheme. Where the alteration is deemed to be substantial by any of those groups a re-authorisation process, including Public Consultation, must be initiated.

18: A) To what extent do you agree with the approach not to prescribe forms of notices within the Draft Regulations?

Disagree

Consistent wording of notices may be beneficial for Community Councils, Community Representatives and Members of the Public in order to make it clear what is being applied for. Being consistent will help prevent ambiguous or obscure wording being used in notices to prevent full understanding while declaring transparency but is in fact very opaque. This would be best dealt with by providing prescribed forms to avoid manipulation of the process to the benefit of the Local Authority.

19: A) To what extent do you agree with the proposed process set out in the Draft Masterplan Consent Area Scheme (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2024 contained within Annex B?

Disagree

From experience developers and investors will try to avoid EIAs as much as possible as will the planning authorities. Many of them see EIAs as tying their hands and a negative cost.

Where an EIA is recognised, to ensure, prior to consent for a qualifying project being taken, that it is done so in the full knowledge of any likely significant effects on the environment all steps to avoid or minimise adverse effects have been considered and if these adverse effects cannot be overcome the project will be restricted to what is possible.

Mitigations will have to be borne by the developers and investors.

20: A) To what extent do you agree with our approach to the impact assessments?

Agree   

No Comment

CLIMATE CHANGE – THE POSSIBLE IMPACT FOR NAIRN

Presented at a joint meeting of NAIRN COMMUNITY COUNCILS – 22 MAY 2024

Climate Change is something over which ordinary people have little or no control.  It is changing the face of the world and day and daily it is accelerating.  It is true to say that every day somewhere on the earth a country and its people are experiencing the effects of climate change brought on by centuries of industrialisation.

    • This paper focuses on Nairn and how climate change is and will affect significant change to the people, landscape, wildlife and sea life and importantly to the economic sustainability of Nairn and its surrounding area.
    • Nairn’s coastline is small in comparison with other areas such as Caithness but it has a much greater population and its location along the A96 means it is a thoroughfare for economic sustainability for the Moray Coast. 
    • Tourism is a major driver of the local economy and as such anything that threatens this must be taken seriously and forward planning put in place as a pre-requisite to at prevent or at least delay the effects on our area and its long term survivability as a self-supporting county town.
    • Because we know that climate change is advancing, it is all the more important that as part of our Local Place Plan it is recognised and work is started as soon as possible to mitigate the effects on Nairn by ensuring every avenue is explored which can help to alleviate the devastating consequences of this global event for future generations.
    • There are a whole range of issues which taken as individual items may not seem related but in fact combined they all play their part in recognising the areas of concern and also hopefully providing a part in the solution.  There is not a silver bullet but by taking an holistic approach across the spectrum of the following areas we can try to address the problem by taking a pragmatic view and targeting those areas we, as local people, have some control or influence over.
    • The issues, in no particular order, are –
    • Coastal Erosion – no direct control over climate change/tides/storms
    • River Flooding
    • Flood Risk Management
    • Wider Development such as Ardersier, Cromarty Firth
    • Water and Sewerage
    • Common Good
    • Funding
    • Tourism Strategy
    • Areas under threat – Fishertown, Golf Courses, Caravan Park, Links, Beaches, Sewage Works
    • Taking each of these in turn
    • Coastal Erosion

    Coastal Erosion is accelerating year on year and its impact on our coastal areas and amenities, housing, and farming land is now clear for all to see.  At present coastal erosion is happening at different speeds depending on location and exposure to tides and wind exposure.  Nairn this year has had its fair share of north easterly winds, with more rain, stronger storms and ever increasing higher tides.

    As a tourist destination Nairn has no alternative but to tackle this head on with as much vigour as possible.  the reason why tourists come to Nairn is its beaches, links. Golf courses and open green flat spaces.  If our beaches are washed away in storms or storm surges are so high they flood through onto the Links and into Fishertown, our distinctive conservation area, then this would be a disaster for Nairn. 

    This is a major priority for the very existence of the people of Fishertown and of the local economy.

    • River Flooding

    Not only is coastal erosion directly impacting the Nairn coastline, increased rainfall, storms and rising sea levels are affecting the River Nairn in the form of much higher tides.  Heavier rainfall in the form of thunderstorms and prolonged rain causes burns and other watercourses to surge with water into the River Nairn along its whole length.  This increases the potential for a flooding event. SEPA has already set out areas of risk along the River Nairn, including at Househill, Maggot, Nairn Dunbar Golf course, Caravan park, River Nairn through the built up town area and of course Fishertown.

    This year there have been several events when high tides have caused flooding onto the Maggot, Riverside walks on both sides of the river, Auldearn and Altonburn watercourses have overflowed onto neighbouring land impacting housing.

    In Fishertown, albeit the flood gates were closed from October 2023 to mid-May 2024, and this has prevented ingress from rising river levels, there is still the problem of high tides backflowing through drainage pipes and drains in car parks and streets and it is only a matter of time before such events will give rise to serious damage.

    Added to this equation is the fact that the Victorian combined sewerage network (CSN) (sewerage and surface water drainage) is approximately 27% overcapacity and therefore during times of prolonged rain and thunderstorms, in order to avoid sewerage impacting low lying areas such as Fishertown, Scottish Water discharges untreated sewage into the river Nairn, which then flows onto our beaches.

    There are areas of the River Nairn, for example at the Howford Bridge where this change in rainfall and storms has eroded significant parts of the riverbank and indeed, changes the course of the river. 

    All of these natural phenomena combined with rising sea levels will inevitably come together in a ‘perfect storm’ which could change the face of Nairn forever.

    • Flood Risk Management (FRM)

    Nairn is in the unfortunate position of being cleft between two local authorities, Highland to the west and Moray to the East, with Moray Council being the lead authority with regard to Flood Risk Management.

    Albeit Nairn has been designated the highest flood risk in the Highlands, the Council decided in 2023 not to proceed with Flood Risk studies in the Nairn and other areas because of the serious financial position of the Council.  Likewise, Moray is also in serious financial straits and therefore Nairn is not attracting the level of FRM which is required to secure its future.

    Notably, Elgin, Forres and the Lossie flood plan have already benefitted from almost £100M in funding for flood defences.  Inverness, however, has benefitted significantly from wide ranging flood defence schemes while Nairn has received nothing.

    This situation needs to be rectified and the Community Councils/Local Place Plan should be addressing serious questions to the Moray Council and Highland Council to work together to reach a solution which will protect Nairn.

    Importantly, in order for Nairn to attract national funding from the Scottish Government, there first of all needs to be FRM studies carried out which can then be used as evidence for national funding.  However, neither Highland nor Moray Council are actively pursuing these studies and therefore until these are carried out, Nairn will not be eligible for national funding.

    Highland Council did recently commission a survey of the Nairn coastline but did not offer any real funding support to put in place substantial flood defences; moving and replanting marram grass is not the answer and a more engineered solution requires urgent action.

    • Wider Development such as Ardersier, Cromarty Firth

    The Port of Ardersier is developing capabilities to act as a docking port for the green energy sector and to this end has been granted a licence to excavate 4.8M3 tonnes of sand from spit at Ardersier in order to achieve a water depth for vessels and future development of floating wind turbines and their bases.  Additionally, the site will also undertake the decommissioning of oil rigs, construction of a concrete batching plant, green energy storage, and possibly even a Green steel mill.

    With rising sea levels, changes in weather patterns, and more thundery weather, it is inevitable that the dredging of sand will require to be an almost constant feature of the Port of Ardersier.  However, the sand must be dumped elsewhere and presently it is being taken on barges and discharged in the Moray Firth [where I don’t know and how much is being discharged is also an unknown quantity].

    As this dredged sand is relocated into the Moray Firth, we have to consider what impact, if any, it is/will have on the Nairn coastline and possibly some form of study should be commissioned possibly as part of a thesis for a student in Environmental Studies. 

    Some people will say that this is pie in the sky stuff and that when McDermotts was in full swing in the 60s – 90s dredging of sand was carried out on a regular basis.  However, 35 years on, and with climate change accelerating rapidly, we must examine every possible avenue which could affect our coastline and how it is affecting sea life and wildlife, our marine protection areas, RAMSAR/SSSI sites and our beaches, which inevitably impacts on Nairn’s tourism and ability to be a sustainable town.

    • Water and Sewerage
    • Water

    As summers get hotter and winters become wetter, it is pivotal to life that there is a sufficiently accessible water supply.  Nairn Lochloy is a perfect example where housing building was consented without an adequate essential water supply being available and being provided in parallel with development.  Water pumping equipment had to be installed to enable householders the use of appliances and many residents said a number of years ago before these additional water pumping stations were installed, …. It was like filling your bath with a teaspoon.

    Businesses in Grigorhill also experience low water pressure and often it means one business cannot use power washers to clean plant and other equipment, before they can be maintained and repaired, until another business finishes using the water.  This is wholly unsatisfactory, ineffective and costs businesses money inasmuch as plant and machinery needs to be as effectively used as possible.

    While Raitloan (redundant water supply for Nairn Town Centre) has received a major overhaul from Scottish Water, it is still necessary to ensure that all of Nairn has the capability of having access to a supply of water in order to accommodate the large influx of tourists from April to October, to enable businesses to expand and to allow our Hotels, BnBs, restaurants and other facilities like the swimming pool, splashpad to operate to their potential.  Questions need to be asked of Scottish Water, possibly as part of the LPP exercise, viz a viz long hot summers and what water capacity is available to meet such an event, which going on the last 5/6 years are growing in number.

    • Sewerage

    As already mentioned above, the Victorian CSN is already overcapacity resulting in sewerage discharges at times of prolonged rain and thunderstorms. Previous to 2015 the water in the River Nairn and at specific locations along the central and east beaches between May and end September were monitored for escherichia coli (E.Coli) and intestinal Enterococci (IE).  SEPA monitored these bacteria levels under EU water quality regulations.  This highlighted significantly high levels of these two bacteria which were considered to be a threat to the wellbeing of all who entered the water, including pets and other wildlife. 

    In 2015 the beaches of Nairn were threatened with closure due to ‘poor’ quality of bathing water, Nairn asked SEPA together with Scottish Water to help with the problem because of the knock on effect to tourism.  After years of meetings and both SEPA and Scottish Water conducting major pieces of work, electronic signage was sited at the entrances to the Central and East beaches. This signage informs the public when swimming or going into the water is not advised.  This then allows the public to make the choice and be aware of the risks.

    Prolonged rain and flash thunderstorms still mean that in order to prevent danger to homes, particularly in Fishertown as it is the lowest lying area in Nairn, Scottish Water will open the relief ports into the River Nairn to allow the CSN to discharge untreated sewerage.  As we all now know what was identified by Nairn almost 10 years ago is a day and daily occurrence throughout the whole of the country, and while Water bodies are under an obligation to ensure sewerage is not routinely discharged into rivers, lochs, and other watercourses, the regulations do allow for discharges in the event of serious capacity issues.  For Nairn, as most of the Highlands with the exception of Inverness, it is highly improbable that there will be major upgrades to CSNs:  this would be exorbitantly expensive and time is not on anyone’s side.

    New Housing developments are required to use a two tier sewerage and drainage system inasmuch as surface water drainage does not combine with sewerage and instead is discharged into swales and SuDs ponds.  However, in the case of Nairn, only Lochloy, which was built over the last 25-30 years has this two tier system.  The remainder of Nairn is accommodated via the CSN.  Scottish Water has made it clear that development on the west side of Nairn, i.e. Sandown, Delnies etc. must discharge its sewerage via the new WWTWs at Ardersier rather than via the CSN of Nairn which discharges across the river to the Nairn WWTWs at the rear of the East beach.

    Another potential and serious concern as coastal erosion gathers pace, is the threat, in possibly 10-15 years, to the Nairn WWTWs from sea water.  This is something which needs addressing now in discussions with Scottish Water in order to mitigate the effects of coastal erosion to this vitally important piece of infrastructure and ensure the long term future of Nairn.

    • Common Good

    Pivotal to most tourism and amenity related activities in Nairn is its Common Good land which stretches from Nairn Dunbar Golf Course, Parkdean Caravan Park, Links, and Play park all the way to the swimming pool.  This land so to speak belongs to the Burgh of Nairn for the benefit of its residents.  Highland Council administer and manage it on behalf of the people of Nairn.  If climate change goes unchecked, coastal erosion, river flooding, and sewerage issues will decimate the very lands which have been the mainstay of Nairn’s tourism. 

    Some will say it is decades away before that happens and there are other more pressing issues.  Not so, the defences which will be required to protect Nairn’s Common Good land and its beaches and thus its tourism, will cost tens , if not hundreds of millions of pounds and decades to complete.  Nairn is not yet at the stage of drafting a strategy or preparing a plan.  Such a strategy will take time to carefully prepare and will need continual review, particularly as climate change accelerates and priorities shift, and monies will have to be found to resource such project.

    The time for action is now and this must be done by taking an holistic approach to the whole concept of climate change and how it will, not might, affect Nairn, it’s Common Good, and the local economy.

    • Funding

    Every possible funding stream must be investigated together with private investment.  Currently, in the light of the serious financial constraints facing Highland Council, Highland Councillors took the decision in September 2023 to defer any funding for FRM studies until 2028 or may be longer.  Nairn cannot apply for national funding from the Scottish Government until FRM studies have been undertaken and it may be nearer 2028-30 before funding becomes available to Highland Council to undertake these studies.

    The Coastal Communities Fund is allocated each year to Highland Council and approx. 4 years ago Highland Councillors agreed a primary methodology whereby this funding was allocated based on the length of a ward’s coast line and in the case of Nairn, because of its short coast line compared to other wards, Nairn has received minimal funding, despite the fact that Nairn is one of the most popular tourism destinations in the Highland and along the Moray Coast because of its beaches, links and golf courses.

    A possible solution would be for Nairn Ward Members to bring forward an alternative/modified approach to enable a portion of this Coastal Communities funding to be ringfenced and allocated for urgent FRM studies to allow coastal towns like Nairn to have studies done and therefore become eligible for national funding.

    Additionally, the Scottish Government has recently announced a £5M fund for community Climate Change initiatives which could help address this issue.  Nairn needs to secure some of this funding as soon as possible.

    • Tourism Strategy

    The Indicative Regional Spatial Strategy which accompanied the Inner Moray Firth Local Development Plan recently adopted by Highland Council stated that the Council’s vision for Nairn was as a sustainable Tourism Centre, something which the whole of Nairn welcomes.

    However, there is no Tourism and Visitor Management Strategy for Nairn or not one that has been made available to the residents of the town.  Highland Council has recently published an update on its Tourism Strategy but Nairn fails to be mentioned anywhere in this document.  So a coherent and pragmatic strategy documents needs to be compiled for Nairn with realistic and deliverable objectives.  Such a strategy should form part of the LPP, and it is essential that an any Tourism and Visitor Management Strategy looks at short term and long term issues (before Bypass and after Bypass, and bearing in mind climate change and other infrastructure issues) and is developed and put in place to ensure a future sustainable and economically self-reliant Tourism sector within Nairn.

    Highland Council prepared its Strategic Tourism Infrastructure Development Plan in 2022 which provided a more strategic approach to the development of tourism infrastructure investment, particularly projects funded by the Rural Tourism Infrastructure Fund (RTIF).  While a significant number of communities throughout the Highlands have benefitted from this fund, Nairn has not been so lucky and yet Highland Council in their IRSS consider and envision Nairn as a sustainable tourism centre contributing to the Highland economy.

    Certainly Nairn’s tourism figures are high compared with many others yet Nairn has not been on the receiving end of funding.  The questions which need to be answered are why and what can be done to change Nairn’s fortunes?  One specific area which needs addressing is a detailed analysis of Nairn Tourism figures.  It is understood that BID, as the Destination Management Organisation recognised by Highland Council, has such local figures yet Nairn continues to receive nothing from the RTIF.  The figures needed are visitor numbers, direct expenditure, economic impact and direct employment to name but a few.

    Additionally, Nairn needs to get its fair share of budgets as well as funding, such as the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF) if Nairn is to continue to thrive and be a self-sustaining local place. 

    • Ward Members

    Our Ward Members are ready to go into bat for Nairn.  As a priority, we need to be able to provide them with evidence and proposed solutions to enable them to persuade their Council colleagues that a change in policy with regard to the Coastal Communities and Rural Tourism Investment Funds is now needed.  If Highland Council’s vision of Nairn as a sustainable Tourism destination is to be realised, then a more pragmatic approach to how funding is allocated is now required.

    As an integrated Climate Change strategy emerges from Nairn’s community via its Local Place Plan, our Ward Members can take this forward with Highland/Moray Councils and with the Scottish Government.

    Cross Linking

      NPF4 focuses on the place principle and the wellbeing of the people who live and work in a place.  Climate change impacts on most if not all the NPF4 policies and therefore when compiling Nairn’s strategy to locally address climate change an holistic approach must be taken to address a multitude of issues such as

      • IRSS
      • Coastal Defences
      • Flood Risk Management of our River Nairn and other watercourses
      • Infrastructure
      • Tourism and expansion of businesses/jobs
      • Fair share budgets and equitable access to funding both at national level and locally determined funding by Highland Council
      • Wider developments which may impact Nairn such as the freeport at Ardersier, housing, essential infrastructure
      • How to protect
        • Fishertown/and other housing close to the River
        • Amenities -Golf Courses, Caravan Park, Links, Beaches, Swimming Pool
        • Sewage Works

      List not exhaustive

      Tackling the issue of Climate Change in a proactive, local, and forward thinking way is not a small task and no doubt the boundaries of such a project will continually change but it is something which Nairn needs to do now for the future of Nairn and its next generations.

      Action required

        A cohesive, joined up approach is required.  A Working Group with the inclusion of our four Ward Members needs to be urgently set up to address Climate Change and its impact for Nairn from

        • A tourism perspective
        • Protection of homes and lives in Fishertown
        • Protection of common good assets, including caravan park, links and both golf courses
        • Protection and damage from flooding along the length of the River Nairn
        • Sustainability of the Nairn economy
        • List not exhaustive

        This will be a long term working group but the most urgent issue to be addressed is securing funding for FRM studies to be commenced as soon as possible.  As already mentioned, even when these studies are completed and submitted to the Scottish Government, they are added to an ever growing list of submissions for funding from all over Scotland and it may, therefore, take 10-15 years at least before any funding is allocated to Nairn.

        Around the country, the average coastal erosion over the last 1/2 years, and particularly noticeable last year, has been between 5-7 metres (ie 23ft) – in some locations it is more. 

        • Think about the beaches and their proximity to the Links path, Caravan site, Nairn Golf courses and sewage works and how much land will be eroded if the pace of erosion mentioned above continues.  It doesn’t take a mathematician to work out the scale of the problem in 10 years time! 
        • Think about all the people who live in Fishertown. 
        • Think about Nairn’s status as a tourist destination and the impact for BnBs, Hotels, Restaurants and Town Centre.
        • Think about the loss of Common Good assets
        • Think about what will happen to Nairn.

        I am not a green warrior but I do recognise the significant impact Climate Change will bring to Nairn.  Our Local Place Plan not only needs to spell this out clearly but it has to demonstrate the Community is proactively working together to

        • consider solutions
        • secure funding
        • raise Nairn’s profile and need with Highland and Moray Councils as well as the Scottish Government
        • prepare a dynamic short/long term strategy to address changing circumstances

        This paper was written to stimulate thoughts and discussion.

        NRCC_LT_V3_220524

        NRCC Public Meeting Wed 24 April 24

        The next meeting of Nairn River Community Council will be held in public at

        Nairn Community and Arts Centre at 7pm

        Wednesday 24th April 2024. All welcome.

        A G E N D A        

        1. Members Present, Apologies and Declarations of Interest.
        2. Minutes of previous meeting matters arising
        3. Treasurers Report.
        4. Planning Report.
        5. Station Brae/Westbury Road/Millbank Crescent modifications.
        6. Drains in River area require cleaning of residue build up after recent street cleaning.
        7. Grantown Road crossing bin has been burned again and requires replacing with a more robust model.
        8. Fence at cemetery adjacent to the Rail viaduct still an eyesore.
        9. Litter in Town Centre, dirty pavements and damage to road surfaces requires action before tourist season kicks off again.
        10. Repair pavement on Mill road next to allotments. Recent activity on replacing street lighting has resulted in stones left lying on the pavement and verges. Several greenhouses on the allotments have been damaged.
        11. Updates from Ward Members Activities Supporting the Residents of the Ward.
        12. WBM – 13/03/2024.
        13. New Nairn Academy and position of the Library.
        14. Update on LPP
        15. Coastal erosion.
        16. Next Meeting date.   
        17. Chair closes meeting